In a podcast with my good friend Stormy Waters, we explored my hunch that there is a deliberate attempt to blame the so-called “Woke Right” for a fracturing Republican base and poor performance in upcoming elections.
Oppose the neoconservatives? That’s a negative strategy, something the grievance-mongering faux conservative movement always seems to opt for.
How about just being pro-White? The policy results would be the same.
We’re going to get called nasty names anyway, but instead of answering “I’m not anti-Semitic” or “I’m not a racist,” it’s far better to answer “I’m simply pro-White. You got a problem with that?”
You raise an interesting paradox when you refer to “all non-white ethnicities” and then to “successful strategies.”
Historically and civilizationally, what non-white ethnicities have ever been as successful as the individualistic White West?
Hasn’t the global hegemony of Whites corresponded with the Enlightenment and liberalism, not with the in-group favoritism of either the medieval tribe or Christendom? Isn’t the modern world in every way our (White) world? (See the famous quote by Joseph Sobran.)
It seems to me that our current postwar extreme liberalism (the Open Society) tore down the West’s traditional guardrails in a fit of shock over Europe becoming the charnel house of the 20th Century. With an extra push from the Boomer generation that came of age after the war, successive “revolutions” — Sexual, Racial, Feminist, etc. — completed the destruction and left Enlightenment liberalism untethered and FREE! to proceed to its logical conclusions without any authoritative pushback.
To regain the balance the West had in its glory, isn’t it time to assert a collective purpose that doesn’t throw the genius baby out with the bathwater?
And given that we Whites are 8% of the global population and obviously under siege from the far less successful non-white world, isn’t White racial consciousness, the belief in our survival and our flourishing as an unquestioned good, that purpose?
The U.S. took over as successor vessel and evolution of British Empire, still heavily financial in operation, but meant to achieve better global permeation and acceptance by discarding its ethnic supremacist basis.
To this end, heavy indoctrination into outgroup preference was implemented, repurposing the WW2 propaganda apparatus.
This modern experiment in pluralism is failing because you cannot buy loyalty from disparate peoples, only rent it, and only for as long as you are the highest bidder.
Maybe the real Samson Option is the houses we sold to Blackrock along the way
"...we’ll lose something far greater than an election — we’ll lose our credibility."
Really sums it up don't it
“Credible losers”
"Agree to give your country away to Indians so you can win the election" is less persuasive than they seem to think.
Makes me think we should have a Samson Option of our own...
Interesting conclusion.
Oppose the neoconservatives? That’s a negative strategy, something the grievance-mongering faux conservative movement always seems to opt for.
How about just being pro-White? The policy results would be the same.
We’re going to get called nasty names anyway, but instead of answering “I’m not anti-Semitic” or “I’m not a racist,” it’s far better to answer “I’m simply pro-White. You got a problem with that?”
You mean how all nonwhite ethnicities operate? You mean it's not a successful strategy to play a team sport as an atomized individual?
You raise an interesting paradox when you refer to “all non-white ethnicities” and then to “successful strategies.”
Historically and civilizationally, what non-white ethnicities have ever been as successful as the individualistic White West?
Hasn’t the global hegemony of Whites corresponded with the Enlightenment and liberalism, not with the in-group favoritism of either the medieval tribe or Christendom? Isn’t the modern world in every way our (White) world? (See the famous quote by Joseph Sobran.)
It seems to me that our current postwar extreme liberalism (the Open Society) tore down the West’s traditional guardrails in a fit of shock over Europe becoming the charnel house of the 20th Century. With an extra push from the Boomer generation that came of age after the war, successive “revolutions” — Sexual, Racial, Feminist, etc. — completed the destruction and left Enlightenment liberalism untethered and FREE! to proceed to its logical conclusions without any authoritative pushback.
To regain the balance the West had in its glory, isn’t it time to assert a collective purpose that doesn’t throw the genius baby out with the bathwater?
And given that we Whites are 8% of the global population and obviously under siege from the far less successful non-white world, isn’t White racial consciousness, the belief in our survival and our flourishing as an unquestioned good, that purpose?
I remember when Paul Ryan threw the House and a bunch of GOP pols retired prematurely.
They gotta be running low on such pols.
They still exist… 81 R’s voted to fund the NED, so there’s work to do. But the situation is much better now than in 2018.
How dare you be optimistic! You need to piss yourself and blackpill damn it!
Your essays all have a female AI voice. Any way to change this?
It doesn’t happen with other accounts.
Should be fixed now
It is infact not fixed, but will be going forward
"Computer, execute Burden article 117-3, simulate Shri Thanadar voice"
The U.S. took over as successor vessel and evolution of British Empire, still heavily financial in operation, but meant to achieve better global permeation and acceptance by discarding its ethnic supremacist basis.
To this end, heavy indoctrination into outgroup preference was implemented, repurposing the WW2 propaganda apparatus.
This modern experiment in pluralism is failing because you cannot buy loyalty from disparate peoples, only rent it, and only for as long as you are the highest bidder.